George Boeree | Re: [LFN] Re: si?

Hi, everyone.

I'll post this one in English for you.

Generally, I am reluctant to make changes anymore, because lfn has
been on the net for almost 10 years.  We've had many discussions in
the past, and made quite a few changes.  And there is a pretty
sizable number of pieces written in lfn, especially in the wiki.  One
past complaint was "when are you guys going to stop changing lfn so I
can get on with learning it and using it?"

That doesn't mean we need to stop entirely, of course, especially if
we have real issues.  I personally don't have any trouble with a few
homonyms, but if enough people find that to be a flaw, let's find a
solution!

About vocabulary:  A long time ago, we decided to go in two
directions simultaneously.  A large vocabulary is essential for
dealing with the world today.  But on the other hand, a llimited
vocabulary for learning - one that can go a long way - is also highly
desirable.  We have that vocabulary, and it is integrated into the
intro text on webbooks.  I can put together a word list for you if
you like, but you can also find a similar list in the short
dictionaries.

One thing we don't want to do is have innumerable synonyms for
things.  If it can be said with one word or a short phrase, or by
adding an affix, then there is no need for it.  The discussion about
whether we should have separate words for belief and faith would be
an example of a good issue to discuss - I myself don't know.

As for the si/si discussion, here's a suggestion:

si - yes
se - if (from italian, portuges)
su - his, her, its, their (to replace the old se)
el mesma - himself, herself, itself (also presently se)
los mesma - themselves (ditto)

The only other homonym I'm aware of is costa, used for both coast and
cost.  Perhaps this resolution?

costa - coast
custa - cost (from portuges, ~franses)

I am enjoying the discussion - the list has been very quiet lately!

Jorj

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]