Roy McCoy | Esperanta vidpuncto / Esperantic viewpoint

Bjorn scribin:

>> ... I will continually defend such an Esperantic viewpoint,...
>
> Yes, that's your right, but if you read a little more in this group
> I'm sure you'll see that this isn't one of our topics.

Ce planlengo devun esti fasila por omnas? Nu, mi ne planin, exemple,
insisti pri la enmeto del asias radicos etp, sed tamen semblan al mi
ce fasiligo ya estan unu el la presipas temos de hia listo, car estan
tiasele ce vi pensan modifi LFN, cu ne? E mi ya dirin, ne ce mi defendon
*omna* Esperanta vidpuncto, sed nur *tia*: "ce planlengo estu fasila por
chiulos". E mi ancore credan ce nos condividan tia sinteno.

That a planned language should be easy for everyone? Well, I wasn't
planning, for example, to insist on the inclusion of Asian word roots
and so forth, but it nonetheless seems to me that facilitation is indeed
one of the main themes of this list, because it's toward this end that
you're thinking of modifying LFN, right? And I didn't say that I would
defend *every* Esperantic viewpoint, but only *this* one: "that a planned
language should be easy for everyone". And I still believe that we share
that attitude.

Roy

P.S. Mi joyan rimarci la jeesto (presenso?) de Ray Bergmann hiebe.
I'm very glad to see that Ray Bergmann's here. Hi Ray!