George Boeree | Re: [LFN] The future

• Autor: George Boeree (“cgboeree”)
• Tema: Re: [LFN] The future
• Data: 2010-08-24 18:48
• Mesaje: 3174 (a supra, presedente, seguente)

A, me malcomprende tu comenta sur C.  Ma ancora, varias peti no es
cosas problemos. Cuando me parla lfn (a me mesma, natural!), me usa
frecuente la vocales plu como engles, nederlandes, o franses (pe,
como "bar, bet, bit, bought, book" o an "@").

Me no pote acorda con tu regardante numeros en PIE:
PIE "oinos, duwo, treies, kwetwores, penkwe, sweks, septm, okto,
newn, dekm" no es plu simil a
farsi " yak, do, se, chahar, panj, shesh, haft, hasht, noh, dah",
rusce "odin, dva, tri, chetyre, pyat, shest, sem, vosem, devyat, desyat"
o hindi "ek, do, tin, ca:r, panc, chai, sat, ath, nau, das"
ce lfn "un, du, tre, cuatro, sinco, ses, sete, oto, nove, des."

On Aug 24, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Lokai Ikaeza wrote:

> Grazie per rapida responde!
>
> Jorj, First of all I am not denying that the C sound is always a k,
> I am
> just saying I naturally have begun to say, or have a tendency to
> say the c
> as a {x-sampa:/ts/ or /s/} at times. A good example is Acel, I
> always have
> said it as {x-sampa:/atsel} This seems to be the case for me, if
> the c is
> before an e or i. This is what I mean by dialects, because we do
> not speak
> it frequently and with each other, we therefore speak a different
> dialect
> each. I definitely do not trill my r's, it is either an {x-sampa:/
> 4/ or /R/}
> with me. again I have a tendency again to "schwa" my e's especially
> if there
> is an s that precedes it, and the other thing I notice I do is the
> x sound
> vaires between a /S/, /s`/ or /s\/
>
> per esemplo: Xuta /s\uta/ Mexican /mes\ikan/ Ataxica /atas`ika/
> Per /p@R/
>
> Perhaps we should start a fund, and find a place to live together, and
> create a regional language, and hope it grows organically to the
> rest of the
> world? =P
>
> When I complain about the numeral system, I am not saying it is no
> good, I
> just think that PIE is much more universal as it touches on slavic,
> baltic,
> and indo-iranian languages. 50% of the speak the top 7 languages,
> true.
> However I think PIE is much more universal. We must not forget lots of
> people also speak Bangladeshi, Urdu, and hindi, which are indic
> languages.
>
> have a look - http://rjschellen.tripod.com/IENums.htm