George Boeree | Re: [LFN] Is the lingua-franca-nova.net Site Moribund?

• Autor: George Boeree (“cgboeree”)
• Tema: Re: [LFN] Is the lingua-franca-nova.net Site Moribund?
• Data: 2010-05-13 17:33
• Mesaje: 3146 (a supra, presedente, seguente)

Tu eposta recorda a me ce nos debe parla en lfn a esta grupo!

Un demanda: en cual modo lfn es no clar?

Regardante espaniol: me pensa ce on no nesesa simpli la lingua. La
spele es clar, e la conjuga es complicada, ma no tro difisil.

Con amia,
Jorj

On May 12, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Patrick Chevin wrote:

> The main problem about IALs is that they are just additional
> languages spoken by almost nobody and as a consequence of almost
> nobody's interest... IAL's maladie infantile is Zamenhof/Schleyer's
> thinking that a newspeak can be attractive enough to conquer the
> world... The world doesn't give a shit to languages except as a
> compulsory matter...
>
> Though I have participated to both Esperanto and Elefen, I don't
> think they match the requirements to an ideal international
> language (neither does english). Esperanto, because it's too
> complicated and hard to spell sometimes, and Elefen because it's
> not clear...
>
> English is a global language but most of the people who deal with
> it do it in a condition of  illetrates... It is quite a difficult
> language to be fluent in. I suppose that if one could have access
> to russian in the same condition than English, he or she would go
> much further with it...
>
> I would say that Spanish is the cheapest way to an comfortable
> international communication, maybe in a simplified version
> (spelling and conjugation). That's why I have made an attempt with
> InterRoman (on wiki de LFN) though only as a demonstration...
>
> Friendly yours, Patric (I'm sorry for my poor english)
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]