Nicholas Hempshall | Re: [europidgin] Re: Simplified pronouns from George (was: general comments)

--- rayberau <rayber@...> wrote:
> --- In europidgin@y..., Kevin Smith
> <yahoogroups@q...> wrote:
> > I think this might be a good compromise. I would
> propose using these
> > singulars:    mi tu lo
> > Then, for plurals, traditionalists could use: nos
> vos los
> > And pidginists like me could use: mis tus los
> > > I agree that the possessive is not necessary --
> > > simply using me, etc, before the noun is great!
>
> Ray Bergmann respondan:
> Mi ance (= ancem) pensa (= pensan) ce la sisteme
> pronome (= pronoma
> sistemo) de LFN no es (= esan) sufisinte(m) regula:
> "io, vu, so" con
> la plurales "ios, vus, sos" pote eser base (= potan
> esen basa).

I think that there is a good case for pronouns being
irregular and distinct, so as to avoid
misunderstandings.

The use of "s" for the plurals, seems guaranteed to be
misheard in speech when followed by a word that starts
with "s" or any word to which an initial "s" could be
added and which then forms another valid word.

Maybe even "nos, vos, los" are too similar?

Nick

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
http://news.yahoo.com