Paul Bartlett | Re: [LFN] The future

On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Steven wrote:

> Having investigated a number of different conlangs in the past few
> weeks, I can honestly say that, despite its apparent lack of
> popularity, LFN is by far the easiest to speak, and I think that is
> absolutely vital in instigating the development of an international
> auxiliary language.  I'm not expert, but LFN is certainly the one I
> choose to learn because of its ease of use, and I will continue to
> learn it, despite its apparent unpopularity.

I have just addressed in anther response just a few minutes ago.  If
you want Lingua Franca Nova to succeed (and I encourage you if you have
interest), it will take serious effort to push against the momentum of
English -- the most successful international auxiliary language in
history!! (just not a constructed one) -- and Esperanto, which probably
has more active users that all other conIALs put together.

--
Paul Bartlett