Tom Cook | Re: si e si
Alo,
Is 'se' not suitable or it is used elsewhere? I hate to be a pain
about this, I am just curious. I believe this is a great idea and
concept for a language and it works well, but I would think there
might be another way to work this. Yes, it is petty on my part but
after looking at nearly every IAL, it is something i haven't seen
before. I think the main idea behind constructed languages is clarity.
I feel it could be changed somehow to make it less likely to be an issue.
Are there plans for a text book?
Tom
--- In LinguaFrancaNova@yahoogroups.com, George Boeree <cgboeree@...>
wrote:
>
> Is there a reason why they are the same? Yes: si is the most commmon
> form for both yes and for if in the romance languages. After
> consternating over this, I began to realize that there are (I
> believe!) no situations in which the two meanings can be confused.
>
> Jorj
>
> On Jan 31, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Tom Cook wrote:
>
> > If there a reason for this?
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > --- In LinguaFrancaNova@yahoogroups.com, George Boeree <cgboeree@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Si!
> > >
> > > On Jan 5, 2008, at 10:53 PM, Hal Jordon wrote:
> > >
> > > > the word for yes is the same as the word for if, yes?
> > > >
> > > > Tom
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>