Stefan Fisahn | Re: [LFN] Freezing the basic grammar

On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:21:33AM -0000, Isaac Ben Harush wrote:

> - Was there any disscusion here about anouncing the grammar of LFN
> to be "stable" at some point? Is such a thing planned? I do not mean
> as Esperanto's sacred "Fundamento", but just as an agreement that
> the grammar will not be altered further, unless some new idea makes
> substantial improvement (unlikely). I believe such a formal
> announcement to be beneficial in the eyes of outsiders.

Hi Isaac,

I agree, sometimes I hear similar from people are interested in LFN -
but they're not sure about the stage of LFN.
LFN is stable - ready for go - ready for use in all ranges.
But LFN is not resistant against improvements.

Maybe we should use the method of programmers - by giving a version.
As strong statement:

LFN version 1.0

A strong increase of the vocabulary could be expressed by a minor
version.

LFN version 1.1 and so on.

Just a Idee, this method could have also some drawbacks.
A version 1.0 may persuade a version 2.0, 3.0 and so on.

What do you think?

bon voles,
sf.

--
http://esef.net