Schaeffer, Martin | AW: AW: [LFN] INEPENDENT OR FINAL

GRUPO YAHOO!
2002 · 2003 · 2004 · 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013

Autor: Schaeffer, Martin (“”)
Tema: AW: AW: [LFN] INEPENDENT OR FINAL
Data: 2005-06-06 14:36
Mesaje: 1308 (presedente, seguente)

Hello George,

that is exactly my opinion. Yes it could be LFN, esperanto, interlingua or spanish, chinese, indonesian. But it is very clear that we prefer an idiom like LFN or esperanto. And I think that the most persons of the list agree with me that the difference between chinese, english and LFN, esperanto, interlingua is greater than the difference between LFN and esperanto, or interlingua and esperanto. The conlangs have the advantage that it is more easy to study them.

Martin

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: George Boeree [mailto:cgboeree@...]
Gesendet: Montag, 6. Juni 2005 16:05
An: LinguaFrancaNova@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: Re: AW: [LFN] INEPENDENT OR FINAL

Hello, Martin.

Although I have a special affection for LFN, I do not really care which
language is adopted.  I only think it would be a wonderful thing if one
actually was!  It could be esperanto or interlingua, or it could be
english or spanish, or it could be haitian or romany!  Of course, it
would be better if it were LFN :-)

George

On Jun 6, 2005, at 9:51 AM, Schaeffer, Martin wrote:

> Thanks Stefan,
>
>  1) My opinion is that there have to be an alliance between the
> IAL-projects. ...

--
*** LFN *** Lingua Franca Nova *** LFN ***
Web site: http://www.lingua-franca-nova.net
WikiWiki: http://lfn.esef.net
Mailing list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinguaFrancaNova

Yahoo! Groups Links