Stefan Fisahn | Re: [LFN] Re: Is LFN evolving a lot ?
- Autor: Stefan Fisahn (“esef1968”)
- Tema: Re: [LFN] Re: Is LFN evolving a lot ?
- Data: 2005-04-30 08:13
- Mesaje: 1091 (a supra, presedente, seguente)
Hi Jacqes, Antonio, translating more and more I feel the grammar of LFN should be stable now. The growing vocabulary - thats the point of evoluation. Thats my opinion. I think it's not usefull to compare LFN with the grammar aspect of roman languages like portugues, LFN is a not a romanic language in the view of grammar aspects. Those comparing is a dead-end streest. If I compare how exactly my tongue German is - you englishmen use a poor pidgin =B-) How many words you need to say ... Konnektivit¿tsantragsformular ?? ;-) In another group I read that somebody condeming Interlingua because Interlingua (and all the other isolating conlangs) don't decline the verbs - and so the possibilites of expression seems poor to him. If I look to my second favourite language after LFN: Haiti Creol - they even don't have a passive construction (with the exception "f¿t" for done), they even don't have a word for "to be". But in the last 30 years the became more selfconfident - seeing the fact that HC is not a poor french but a own language with own criterias. sf. On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 11:48:23PM -0000, Antonio Carlos R. da Fonseca wrote: > Rio, 29/04/05 > > Alo jacques > > So, I ask : Is LFN evolving a lot ?... > > E me espera ce continua a evolver, sin teme de cambiar acel ce se > mostra nesesa de eser cambiada. > > And I hope that it continues to evolve, without be afraid of changing > the things that showed to be necessary to be changed. > > Salute, > > Antonio > -- http://esef.net