Muhammad Selim | Re: Lingua Eurana

• Autor: Muhammad Selim (“muham_selim”)
• Tema: Re: Lingua Eurana
• Data: 2004-10-21 14:57
• Mesaje: 810 (a supra, presedente, seguente)

Hello George,

I thougt, the wiki net is an open net to contribute proposals to
your LFN. To restrict the comparing languages to four natural
languages seems to me a little bit narrow. A fifth column in the
vocabulary lists did not disturb the reader, but I respect your
decision. I was astonished how fast you reacted. If I had such a
net, I would allow to edit the files. I also support other
artificial languages, e.g Romanova. The best project will win and
spread.

LFN is a pretty language with a simple grammar for those people who
know a western European language. (It is relativ to declare a
language as "simple" in linguistics.) LFN seems to me a mirror of
English, but with romanic words. For many people speak English, LFN
could be accepted.

I personally expect of a European language more grammatical and
morphical structure. The Latin and Greek dublicates in LFN are not a
progress, I open say. A new language should avoid this. This is also
a phenomen in English, not solved in LFN and hardens my opinion of
the unconscious English mirror used by the LFN team.

Nevertheless I wish LFN to grow and win more supporters.

Is the discussion of LFN grammar and vocabulary closed? As you have
seen I used many LFN words, but changed the endings according a
logical system. I know it is an imputation when another language
creators critizes another language project. I personaly won plenty
of new ideas for Lingua Eurana and also learnt from LFN.

Best wishes

Muhammad Selim