Kevin Smith | Re: [europidgin] Summing up?

On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 12:00, George Boeree wrote:
> past -va
> future -ra
> [same for pijin and LFN]

I seem to be the only person who thinks you should be able to understand
the structure of a sentence without knowing the meaning of every single
word. Despite that, I will share a concern I have about the -va and -ra
endings:

There are many words that end with this pattern that are not inflected
verbs.

So any time someone sees a -va or -ra word, they will have to know if it
is a non-verb word. To know that, they would have to have memorized all
of the words in the vocabulary (1500? 5000?) Then, if it is a verb, they
have to mentally strip off the ending to find the root. I know that last
step comes naturally to Romance-language speakers, but it certainly does
not come easy to me.

Anyway, for your pleasure, I am including a list of all the LFN words
that I could find that look like verbs in the past or future tense, but
are not. I could only find one word that really is BOTH a noun and an
inflected verb at the same time: 'fava'.

I suspect everyone will hate this idea, but could we use a hyphen to
inflect verbs? Instead of 'trotava' we would have 'trota-va'. Instead of
'reatara' we would have 'reata-ra'. I'm not sure I like it, and I don't
know how it would be pronounced, but at least it is unambiguous.

The more I think about verb inflections, the more I dislike them.

Adio,

Kevin

----------------
cara
clara
declara
dispara
gara
rara

caldera
camera
carera
colera
entera
era
espera
frontera
gera
jenera
lasera
lejera
letera
manera
opera
pera
primavera
sera
siera
sinsera
tempera
temporera
tenera
tera
vera

aira
desira
respira

decora
fora
labora
meliora
onora
ora
portaflora
seniora

aventura
cura
dura
figura
fura
matura
mesura
natura
oscura
pura
purpura
secura
sura

----------------
ava
cava
fava

neva

nosiva
oliva
positiva
riva
ariva
ativa
jenjiva
locomotiva
nativa
negativa

nova

uva
----------------